← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/1106/2017allowed

Lala Alias Brijlal Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1106 of 2017 Lala Alias Brijlal Sinha, S/o. Govardhan Sinha, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Village Narayangarh, Chichola, Tehsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Police Station Out Post Chichola, Police Station Chhuria, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :

Mr. S.S.Baghel, Advocate For Respondent :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 02.03.2017 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.13/2017 registered at Out Post- Chichola, Police Station- Chhuria, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2.

As per the prosecution case, on 24.01.2017 on a raid being conducted, from the possession of the applicant alongwith other co-accused total 25.920 bulk liters of illicit liquor was seized and he has arrested on the same day.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the seizure witness in this case namely Siyaram and Saroj Kumar have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution; therefore, considering the fact that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case, he may be released on bail.

4.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however, she is not able to dispute the fact that the seizure witness have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution.

5.

Considering the quantity of the liquor seized i.e. 25.920 bulk liters and further considering the fact that the seizure witness have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.

7.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok