Chairman,C.G.State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No. 281 of 2013

1. Chairman, C.G.State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. Head Office 880, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Managing Director, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Head Office 880, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Secretary, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Head Office 880, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Cooperative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limite Employees Association Through its President Dk Gaurha, aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Jagannath Prasad Gaurha, R/o Indira Chowk, Shyam Nagar, Raipur, P.S. Civil Line Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Registrar Cooperative Societies, C.G. Raipur District:Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Registrar Firms And Societies C.G. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member, Board of Directors, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited Head Office 880, Civil Lines Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners :

Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Arijit Tiwari, Advocates.

For State/Respondent No.

1, 3 & 4 :

Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, Govt. Advocate.

For respondent No.2 :

Mr. Jitendra Nath Nande, Advocate.

For respondent No.5 :

None.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board

Page No.2 22/03/2021 Heard.

1. It is submitted by the counsel for respondents, that the tenure of the respondent union has completed during the pendency of this petition. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous, however, because of this petition, the salary of 10 months of the employees, who are represented by respondent No.2 has been withheld by the petitioner side, regarding which representation has been made for release the same, hence, this petition be disposed off with direction to the petitioner to consider on the representation of the respondent No.2.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner has no objection on this submission and it is submitted, that the petition is now infructuous on the basis of the reasons mentioned by the respondent counsel.

3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. The petitioner is directed to consider on the representation made by the employees under respondent No.2 for release of their salary of 10 months, which has been withheld due to the pendency of this petition. This consideration on representation be made within a period of two months from this date.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nisha