← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4547/2020disposed off

Lala Ram Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-11-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4547 of 2020 1.

Lala Ram Gupta S/o Ramsharan Gupta Aged About 55 Years R/o Raipur Road Naka , Chhiraha Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdhma Chhattisgarh, Poste As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) , Government Primary School Chandaini Block Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

2.

Durgesh Kumar Mehra S/o Devdas Mehra Aged About 47 Years R/o Ward No. 08, Sahaspur Lohara Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) , Government Primary School Bhendra Block Sahaspur Lohara , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3.

Smt. Sindhu Ukey W/o Naresh Ukey Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 08, Teacher Colony Shankar Nagar Kawardha District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) , Government Primary School Badaudakala Block Sahaspur Lohara , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2.

Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3.

District Education Officer Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

4.

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5.

Block Education Officer Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Harshwardhan Rastogi, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sudeep Verma, Deputy G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

26/11/2020 1.

The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2.

Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. The respondents shall also consider the circular issued by the State Government in this regard dated 10.03.2017. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners. 3.

With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved