← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/151/2013disposed off

Rishikesh Ratre And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-10-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 151 of 2013 Rishikesh Ratre And Anr. S/o Dev Prasad Ratre Aged About 25 Years Vill. & Post Baloda, Tah. & Ps. Baloda, Dist. Janjgir-Champa C.G. Samir Katakwar S/o Bharat Lal Katakwar Aged About 29 Years Vill. & Post Baloda, Tah. & Ps. Baloda, Dist. Janjgir-Champa C.G. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. S/o Thru Secrty., Urban Admin. & Devel., Deptt. Mahanadi Bhawan Mantrly., Raipur C.G.

3. Director/dy. Director Urban Admin. & Devel. Deptt. Mahanadi, Bhawan Mantly. Raipur C.G.

4. Distt. Education Officer Janjgir-Champa, Tah. & Ps. Janjgir, Dist. JanjgirChampa C.G.

5. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Baloda, Tah. Ps. Baloda Dist. Janjgir-Champa C.G.

6. Satish Kumar Dewangan S/o Mahendra Kumar Dewangan Shiksha Karmi Grade-Iii, At Govt. Primary School Sadar-Baloda Post & Tah. & Ps. Baloda, Dist. Janjgir-Champa C.G.

7. Mukesh Sahu S/o S.B. Sahu Shiksha Karmi Grade-Iii, At Govt. Primary School Sadar, Baloda, Post Baloda, Tah. & Ps. Baloda, Dist. JanjgirChampa C.G.

8. Badri Prasad Dahariya S/o Budhram Dahariya Shiksha Karmi Grade-Iii, Govt. Primary School Barhatta, Baloda, Post & Tah. & Ps. Baloda, Dist. Janjgir-Champa C.G.

---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board

03/10/2017 Shri Abhishek Pandey appears and seeks permission of the Court to represent the petitioner in place of the earlier counsel. In the circumstances mentioned in the application the application is allowed, he is permitted to appear for the petitioner. Heard on application for withdrawal of Writ petition. Upon due consideration, the application is allowed, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive if cause of action arises. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit