← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3484/2015disposed off

Harihar Prasad Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3484 of 2015

1. Harihar Prasad Singh S/o Late Ramnarayan Singh Aged About 58 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Lecturer Govt. High School Jharna Para Block Baikunthpur Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Schedule Cast And Schedule Tribe Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Upper Collector/ Enquiry Officer Baikunthpur, Distt. Koriya (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Baikunthpur Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri AN Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 28/092015

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner is pending since April, 2010, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent No.1 to conclude the Departmental Enquiry at the earliest.

2. Petitioner is working as Lecturer in the Government High School, Jharna, Block, Baikunthpur. On 24.04.2010 a charge-sheet was issued against the petitioner and a Departmental Enquiry was constituted.

3. According to the petitioner, the enquiry has already been completed,

however, final order has not yet been passed.

4. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, particularly for the reason that the Departmental Enquiry should not be kept pending for indefinite period, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide and pass final order in the Departmental Enquiry at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order before the competent authority.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu