High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3498/2015dismissed

Rajaram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3498 of 2015 • Rajaram Sahu S/o Shri Tijauram Sahu, Aged About 61 Years And 2 Months, Working As Accountant Office Of Block Education Officer, Bemetara, Police Station And District Bemetara, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Durg Division, Durg, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Bemetara, District Bemetara, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, District Bemetara, (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Block Education Officer, Bemetara, District Bemetara, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Chandrabhan Das Mahant, Assistant Grade-2, Govt. Middle School, Karesara, District Bemetara, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Santosh Bharat, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 29/09/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Accountant in the Bemetara District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from the office of Block Education Officer, Bemetara to the Government Higher Secondary School, Khairjhittikala, Block Saja on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the

petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu