Vivek Kumar Pandey v. Chhattisgarh State Information Commission

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2228 of 2018

1. Vivek Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Gaurishankar Pandey, aged about 27 years, R/o Village and Post Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamgarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Information Commission, Through the Chief Information Commissioner, Old Mantralaya, (D.K.S. Bhawan), Indravati Khand, First Floor, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Additional Collector cum First Appellate Authority, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

3. Public Information Officer cum Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. D. Kushwaha, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/08/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has made representation before the respondent No. 1 under Section 18(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for brevity, 'Act of 2005') on 16.05.2018 for compliance of the order dated 02.02.2017 passed in Appeal Case No. 1980 of 2016 that may be directed to be considered and decided expeditiously. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 1 - State Information Commission is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's

application filed under Section 18(2) of the Act of 2005 expeditiously. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka