← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3701/2015dismissed

I. Ippili Nagraju v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Raipur

2015-10-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3701 of 2015 • I. (Ippili) Nagraju S/o Late Shri I. ( Ippili) Chandrashekhar, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Puraina, Post & Police Station Bhilai- 3, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Raipur Through The Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Danganiya, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. The Executive Director ( Durg Region), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Durg, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh).

3. The Superintendent Engineer (City), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Durg, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh).

4. The Executive Engineer ( City East), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh).

5. The Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhilai Charoda Zone, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate For Respondents :

Shri AS Gaharwar, Advocate with Shri S. Majid Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13/10/2015

1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of suspension, issued by the Executive Engineer (City-East) CSPDCL, Bhilai.

2. Shri Gaharwar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on advance notice, would submit that the order is appealable before the Superintendent Engineer.

3. In Union of India and Others v. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Another1, the Supreme Court has held that when statutory remedy is available, High Court should not entertain the petition.

4. In view of the aforesaid proposition of law, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty in favour of the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, in accordance with law. It is expected that the appeal be decided expeditiously.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu (2015) 6 SCC 773