← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5077/2018disposed off

Mukesh Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5077 of 2018 Mukesh Soni S/o Late Shri Kishori Lal Soni Aged About 32 Years Working As A Daily Wages Employee As A Peon At Nagar Panchayat Gourela, R/o Mangli Bazar Gourela, Tehsil Pendraroad, P. S. Gourela, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Directorate Of Administration And Development Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Joint Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Gourela, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Soni, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/08/2018

1. At the outset, the counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the higher authorities in the department claiming the relief of regularization and the respondents may be directed to decide the said representation to be filed by the petitioner.

2. The State counsel does not oppose the same.

3. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner for ventilating his grievance may file a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 30 days from today and on receipt of the said representation, the respondent authorities may take an appropriate

decision in accordance with the circulars and the rules framed by the State Government from time to time so far as the daily wage employees are concerned within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the said representation.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the entitlement of the relief sought for by the petitioner.

5. The writ petition thus stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved