← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2296/2018disposed off

M/S Polybond Insulation Pvt. Ltd v. Union Of India

2018-08-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2296 of 2018 M/s Polybond Insulation Pvt. Ltd A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956, Having Its Registered Office At Chitlangia Compound, Basantpur, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi, District : New Delhi, Delhi

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Mineral Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Department Of Forest Through The Additional Chief Secretary Forest, Aranya Bhavan, North Block Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Under Secretary Mineral Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Additional Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest (Land Management), Department Of Forest, Aranya Bhavan, North Block Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Divisional Forest Officer Balod Forest Division, Balod, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

7. Collector Durg Collectorate, Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. P. K. Bhaduri, G. A.

For Respondent No.1- UoI :

Ms. Jyoti Singh on behalf of Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, ASG.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 14/08/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Central Government has remanded the matter to the State Government for reconsideration by its order dated 09.01.2017 but till date the State Government has not taken any

decision.

2.

Per contra, learned State counsel would submit that petitioner's case will be considered as directed by the Central Government, expeditiously. 4.

Be that as it may, the competent authority is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, after hearing the affected parties.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka