← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5582/2019disposed off

Ajay Kumar Kanwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5582 of 2019 Ajay Kumar Kanwar Sj/o Adalat Singh Kanwar Aged About 30 Years Constable No. 100, 9th Battalion, Arms Force Dantewada, R/o Village Puchheli, Post Sothi, Police Station Saragaon, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Superintendent Of Police / Commandant 9th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director General Of Police Chhattisgarh Arms Force, Police Headquarter Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Deputy Inspector General Of Police Chhattisgarh Arms Force, 2nd South Range (Bastar) Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 31/07/2019 1.

The instant petition has been filed only with a limited prayer. The petitioner was terminated on 06.01.2014, thereafter against such termination, the petitioner has preferred a departmental appeal before the respondent No.3 on 20.11.2017 vide Annexure P/2. A prayer has been made that the said appeal may be decided by the respondent No.3 as the said termination order has an adverse affect to the livelihood to the petitioner and his family members.

2.

Considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner and considering the fact that the petitioner after termination has preferred a departmental appeal before the respondent No.3, which is pending for adjudication, therefore,

-2without any observation on the merits of the case, it is directed that the respondent No.3 shall decide the said departmental appeal, which is filed by the petitioner within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

3.

It is expected that the petitioner shall also cooperate during the course of hearing.

4.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ved