← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/616/2019disposed off

Ashok Shrivasan v. Shri Shiv Anant Tayal

2019-11-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 616 of 2019

1. Ashok Shrivasan S/o Shri B. P. Shrivasan Aged About 53 Years Presently Posted As Upper Divisional Teacher, Sardar Pritam Singh Saini Higher Secondary School, Nagar Palika Nigam, Shyam Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Rajesh Choubey S/o Late Shri G. P. Choubey Aged About 59 Years Presently Posted As Upper Divisional Teacher, B. P. Pujari Higher Secondary School, Nagar Palika Nigam, Raja Talab Raipur , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. Shri Shiv Anant Tayal Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, White House, Jala Road Near Mahila Police Station Janta Colony, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Shri Lokeshwar Sahu, Additional Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, White House, Jala Raod, Near Mahila Police Station, Janta Colony, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Shri P. R. Dhruw, Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, White House, Jala Road, Near Mahila Police Station, Janta Colony, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Shri G.R. Chandrakar, District Education Officer, Department Of School Education, Pensionbada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Applicants :

Mr. K. Rohan, Advocate For Respondents :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

-214.11.2019

1. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, advocate appearing for the respondents today makes a statement that the order has been complied with inasmuch as the petitioners/applicants have now been posted back to the Municipal Corporation, Raipur.

2. This submission of Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioners/applicants.

3. Given the said fact that this Court is convinced that the order passed by this Court stands complied with.

4. Reserving the right of the parties to take appropriate recourse in the pending writ petition, the contempt petition stands disposed-off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul