← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/5857/2018allowed

Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Sonu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 5857 of 2018 • Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Sonu S/o Sunil Singh Aged About 24 Years R/oTetrain, P.S. Dhibhra, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- In-charge Station House Officer, Kotwali, Police Station Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri C. Jayant K.Rao, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri Bhaskar Pyashi, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order On Board 21/08/2018

1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with crime no. 353/2018, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2. As per the prosecution story, on the basis of information received from the informant on 20.07.2018, Police authority searched the applicant and 24 bulk litres of foreign liquor was found from the possession of the present applicant and he has been arrested on 20.07.2018.

3. Shri C.Jayant K.Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent, he is in custody since 20-07-2018 and trial will likely to take some time, therefore, applicant may be released on bail.

4. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of State opposes the

bail application.

5. I have heard learned Counsel for both the parties.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and evidence collected by the prosecution, further considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 20-07-2018 and trial will likely to take some time, without further commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge Shubham