Ekta Mahila Swayam Sahayata Samooh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2272 of 2018 Ekta Mahila Swayam Sahayata Samooh Through Its President Smt. Yasodha Devi, W/o Chandi Prasad, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Dondha, Block Pratappur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Directorate Of Woman And Child Development Department, Indravati Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Commissioner, Surguja Division, Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
4. Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
5. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Services Project Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
6. District Program Officer, Woman And Child Development Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Varunendra Mishra, Advocate.
For Respondents/State :
Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/08/18 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been granted work for supply of ready to eat food by Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Services, Surajpur and agreement was executed for a period of five years from 01.04.2016 till 31.03.2021 but vide Annexure - P/1 advertisement has been issued inviting applications for supply of ready to eat food items.
2.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.
Admittedly, petitioner's agreement has not been terminated and as such there is no cause of action to file this writ petition. In case, notice is issued to the petitioner or his agreement is terminated, he would be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
5.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka