Dhirendra Kumar Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.3490 of 2015 • Dhirendra Kumar Kashyap S/o K. P. Kashyap, Aged About 58 Years Presently Working As Assistant Accountant, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur R/o Jarhabhata, Mandir Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Co-Operatives, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post And PS Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Head Office Zila Sakhari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh And WPS No.3491 of 2015 • Sharad Kumar Sharma S/o Late Bisahu Prasad Sharma, Aged About 59 Years Presently Working As Junior Clerk, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Branch Masturi, District Bilaspur, R/o Jabdapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Cooperatives, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post And P.S. Rakhi, New
Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Head Office Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent-State Mr. Sunil Otwani, Addl. AG For Respondent Nos.3 & 4 Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Adv.
Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/09/2021 1.
Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 & 4, would submit that the petitioners have been allowed to work till the age of 62 years, therefore, the writ petitions have become infructuous.
2.
The statement made by Mr. Shrivastava is placed on record.
3.
Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand disposed of. No order as to cost (s).
Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Nirala