Vinod Kumar Patila And ORS. v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4976 of 2019

1. Vinod Kumar Patila S/o Late Shri Agnu Ram Patila, Aged About 18 Years, Caste - Satnami, R/o Village - Dudera Thana and Tahsil - Dongarhgarh. District Rajnandgaon. Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

2. Pradeep Kumar Tandon S/o Shri Premlal Tandon, Aged About 20 Years, Cast - Satnami, R/o Village Dudera Thana and Tahsil Dongarhgarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. Virendra Sone S/o Shri Baliram Sone, Aged About 20 Years, Cast - Satnami, R/o Village - Belgaon Thana and Tahsil - Dongarhgarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

• The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ----Non-applicant For Applicants - Shri Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State - Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 06-08-2019 1.

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicants for grant of regular bail. The applicants have been arrested on 10-07-2019 in connection with Crime No.364/2019 registered at P.S. Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicants that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. They are in jail since 10-07-2019. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicants may be granted bail. 3.

Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application and submission. It is submitted that total 6.300 bulk liter illicit liquor has been

-2seized from the possession of the applicants. Also, there is previous history of prosecution against them under Section 394 of the IPC. Therefore, the applicants are not entitled for grant of bail. 4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 5.

Considering on the submissions made and the contents of the case diary, detention of the applicants till conclusion of the trial would not serve any purpose. Therefore, for these reasons, I am of the view that the application deserves to be allowed.

6.

Consequently, this application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for their appearance as and when directed. 7.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Aadil