← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5704/2019disposed off

Kamal Narayan Hariharno v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5704 of 2019 Kamal Narayan Hariharno S/o Late Shri Beni Madhav Hariharno Aged About 55 Years R/o Kourinbhatha Ward No. 44, Behind Green Height, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate Urban Administration And Development, Through The Director, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Capital, Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava,Dy. AG For Res. NO. 3 :

Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/08/2019 1.

The dispute raised by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is of non-granting interest on G.P.F. to the father of the petitioner at par that what has been paid to the Government Employees.

2.

The counsel for the parties fairly submit that, the issue involved in the case stands squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in two of the Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017 i.e. in WPS No. 3458/2007 and WPS No. 4640/1999.

3.

In view of the submission made by the counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition also deserves to be and is accordingly allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court in the afore mentioned two Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017.

4.

Let a copy of the judgment passed in the said two Writ Petitions be also made part of the record of this Writ Petition. 5.

The Writ Petition stands allowed and disposed off in similar terms. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE