← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2289/2018disposed off

Meghnath Sidar v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2289 of 2018

1. Meghnath Sidar S/o Shri Chamru Sidar, Aged About 45 Years, Panch Ward No. 06 Gram Panchayat- Jalgarh, Tahsil-Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Lochan Khadiya S/o Shri Lav Khadiya, Aged About 43 Years, Panch Ward No. 03 Gram Panchayat- Jalgarh, Tahsil- Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Upper Commissioner Bilaspur, Division, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The Sub Division Officer (Revenue) Sarangarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Mahesh Ram Ratre S/o Suraj Lal Ratre, Aged About 36 Years, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Jalgarh, Tahsil- Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

6. Harnarayan Nayak Ex-Secretary Gram Panchayat- Jalgarh, TahsilBaramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Roop Naik, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 14/08/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the order of Collector, the Commissioner has entertained the revision filed by respondent No. 5 and stayed the order of Collector, therefore, the Commissioner be

directed to hear the revision expeditiously.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

The prayer is fair and reasonable and is allowed. 4.

Be that as it may, the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division is directed to conclude the hearing of the revision case and decide it finally on or before 28.09.2018.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka