High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6193/2019disposed off

Dhaneshwar Chaudhary v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd.

2019-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6193 OF 2019 Dhaneshwar Chaudhary S/o Shri Ramsunder Chaudhary Aged About 50 Years Technician Distribution -II, C.S.P.D.C.L. Bhanupratappur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. (C.S.P.D.C.L.), Through Its Chairman, Regd. Office At Engery Info Tech. Centre, Daganiya, Raipur.

2. Engineer In Chief Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Jagdalpur, District Baster At Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintendent Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Jagdalpur, District Baster, Chhattisgarh.

4. Superintendent Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

5. Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Somkant Verma. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19.08.2019

1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has made is that the respondents have not released the higher pay scale and other revised pay scale that the petitioner is entitled for and which have been extended to other similarly placed person in the Department.

2. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has already made repeated representation to the authorities concerned, this Court is of the opinion that, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation within a period of 15 days to the respondents No. 3 & 4 who in turn shall take all necessary steps ensuring that the representation of the petitioner is decided at the

earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. It shall be the responsibility to the petitioner to apprise the respondents No. 3 & 4, so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha