← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/1654/2018dismissed

Rajesh Singh v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No.1654 of 2018 • Rajesh Singh S/o Shri Rajnarayan Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o- Deepak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

• The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Police Of Police Station, Pulgaon, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent CRMP No.1656 of 2018 • Rajesh Singh S/o Shri Rajnarayan Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o- Deepak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

• The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Police Of Police Station, Pulgaon, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent CRMP No.1680 of 2018 • Rajesh Singh S/o Shri Rajnarayan Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o- Deepak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

• The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Police Of Police Station, Pulgaon, Durg, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent PRESENT:- Shri Rajat Agrawal, counsel for petitioner/s. Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy.AG for State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board

06/09/2018 1.

Though number of arguments are being raised before this Court to challenge institution of criminal proceedings, this Court finds that these petitions are being filed at this stage when investigation is complete and the charge sheet has already been filed before the Court below and the case awaits framing of charges. Therefore, in these circumstances, when the petitioner has remedy to argue against framing of charge before the Court below in appropriate stage of proceedings, I am not inclined to entertain these petitions.

2.

These petitions are therefore dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the grounds as may be available under the law including the grounds raised in these petitions, at the stage of framing of charge to convince the Court below that no case is made out worth framing of charges. SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Tumane