Sarju Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2347 of 2018

1. Sarju Ram Adhin Aged About 68 Years

2. Radhe Lal Sonwani Radhey Lal Aged About 63 Years Both R/o Village Chunkatta, P.S. Utai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Tahsildar Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Punarad S/o Kartik, R/o Village Chunkatta, Police Station Utai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri C. R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents Shri Rajendra Tripathi, PL Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 21/08/2018 1.

Petitioner has prayed for expeditious disposal of the revenue proceedings drawn by the respondent No.2 for removal of encroachment made by some of the villagers.

2.

Perusal of the document (Annexure-P-1) would reveal that proceeding for removal of encroachment has been initiated against one Punarad, however, petitioner is not a party to the

said proceeding, therefore, the petition is not maintainable. Whether or not a writ petition in the nature of PIL would lie in such matter need not be considered by this Court at this stage, because the present writ petition has not been preferred in the nature of PIL. If any such petition is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered on its own merits.

3.

The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala