High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5760/2019disposed off

Roshan Kumar Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5760 of 2019

1. Roshan Kumar Singh S/o Shri Brijkeshwar Singh Aged About 35 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.)-E At Govt. Primary School Erganwa, Block Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

2. Brij Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Ram Kumar Singh Aged About 33 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.)-E At Govt. Primary School Kusoo, Block Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. Sushil Kumar Singh S/o Shri Ram Bilas Singh Aged About 30 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.)-E At Govt. Primary School Jaypur, Block Lakhanpur, Distict Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. Narayan Singh S/o Shri Sudeshan Ram Aged About 30 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.)-E At Govt. Primary School Jaypur, Block Lakhanpur, Distict Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat-Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Lakhanpur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. R. V. Rajwade, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/08/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit