← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/118/2015dismissed

Smt. Rajkumari Agrawal v. The State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2019-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 118 of 2015 Smt. Rajkumari Agrawal, W/o Shri Shyamlal Agrawal, aged about 58 years, R/o Durkot, P.S. Dabhara, Tahsil Dabhara, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Naya Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Commissioner, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The District Magistrate/ Collector, Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Superintendent Of Police, Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Station House Officer, Dabhara, Tahsil Dabhara, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh.

7. The Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Through The Managing Director, 808, Civil Lines, P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

8. The Chhattisgarh Nagrik Aapurti Nigam Limited, Through The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Nagrik Aapurti Nigam Limited, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

9. Shri Omprakash Choudhari, Presently Posted As Collector, JanjgirChampa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 10.Shri K.P. Karsh, The District Marketing Officer, Markfed, JanjgirChampa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

11. Shri Jitendra Nigam, District Marketing Officer, Nagrik Aapurit Nigam, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. 12.Shri G.D. Patel, Food Officer, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

13.Shri Rajesh Sharma Additional Food Officer, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents

For Petitioner : None For Respondents : Mr. N.K. Vyas, Mr. Akash Pandey & Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocates For State : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19.06.2019 1.

Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition (criminal) for want of prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, this W.P.Cr. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet