Shanker Bhola Mandavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 678 of 2018 • Shanker Bhola Mandavi S/o Late Hanuman Singh Mandavi, Aged About 52 Years R/o Aarna Para, Near Shiv Temple, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2.

Chhattisgarh Krishi Vipanan Board, Through Its Managing Director, Beej Bhawan, Chhattisgarh, Hotel, Ravigram, Telibandha, Post Telibandha, P.S. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Krishi Vipanan Board, Beej Bhawan, Chhattisgarh, Hotel, Ravigram, Telibandha, Post Telibandha, P.S. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4.

The Additional Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Krishi Vipanan Board, Beej Bhawan, Chhattisgarh, Hotel, Ravigram, Telibandha, Post Telibandha, P.S. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Balkeshwar Prasad Sinha, S/o Shri Rameshwar Das Sinha, Occupation Service, Accountant, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Nagri, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents __________________________________________________________________ For Appellant :

Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State :

Shri U.N.S. Deo, Government Advocate For Respondents No.2 to 4 :

Shir Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 20.09.2018 1.

Counsel for the Appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the writ appeal to assail final order which has now been passed by the learned Single Judge as the writ application itself seems to have been decided in the meantime. 2.

Counsel for the Respondents have no objection. 3.

The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Chandra