Ganpat Ram Sahu, v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS NO. 5075 OF 2020 Ganpat Ram Sahu, S/o Late Shri Uday Ram Sahu, aged about 62 years R/o Village Kirwai, Post Damakheda, Police Station & Tehsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur (CG) 2.

Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Block-II, Second Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Simga, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (CG) 4.

Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (CG) 5.

The Collector, Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Rahul Jha, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board /02/2021 1.

Grievance of Petitioner in the present Writ Petition is to the extent that his retiral dues, in spite of the fact that he has been retired from service for more than five months back, have till date not been finalised. 2.

Learned Counsel for Petitioner submits that Petitioner stands retired from the post of Panchayat Secretary with effect from 31.8.2020 but till date he has not received a single penny so far as his retiral benefits are concerned. Learned Counsel for Petitioner further submits that Petitioner has been repeatedly approaching the authorities concerned but of no avail. 3.

Given the limited relief that Petitioner has, the Respondents No. 2 to 4 are directed to immediately process the claim of Petitioner for releasing of his retiral benefits if he is entitled for the same and if any dues are payable to him, the entire claim of Petitioner is settled within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In the event, if Petitioner is entitled for the claim that he is claiming, the Respondents No. 2 to 4 are directed to also ensure that appropriate intimation in this regard is given to Petitioner. 4.

With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ JUDGE