High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/1911/2017dismissed

Smt. Dhan Bai Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-04-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1911 of 2017 Smt. Dhan Bai Dewangan W/o Jitesh Kumar Dewangan Aged About 50 Years R/o Kawar Para, Champa, Police Station & Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, Champa, District - Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For applicant Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent/State Mr. Neeraj Jain, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board 06/04/2017

1. Heard finally.

2. The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No. 294/2016 registered in PS Champa, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG) for offence punishable under Section 302, 201/34 of the IPC. Charge sheet has been filed and presently matter is not yet committed, pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Champa, Distt. Janjgir Champa who registered the case as Criminal Case No. 25/2017.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there are total 4 accused out of them, co-accused Pinki Dewangan, sister-in-law of the deceased had filed M.Cr.C. No. 1614/2017 which is dismissed by this Court on 23-3-2017. Other two co-accused including husband of the deceased have not applied for bail before this Court. The present applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. As per allegation, the application was present in the house. Date of incident is 14-10-2016. FIR was lodged after the report of Merg on 14-11-2016. In the PM report, no definite opinion is given but many injuries were noticed by the autopsy surgeon. The applicant is innocent. She will abide by all

the conditions imposed by this Court while granted bail.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposed the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and submits that police collected evidence against present applicant for her involvement in the offence for murder of deceased Sandhya Dewangan, wife of Pawan Dewangan, daughter-in-law of the present applicant.

5. Perused the material available.

6. On due consideration, looking to the evidence collected by the police and the material surfaced and the heinousness of the crime and involvement of the applicant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant.

7. The application is rejected.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Pathak