← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5496/2021disposed off

Dr. Krishna Kumar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 5496 of 2021 • Dr. Krishna Kumar Verma S/o Late Sukhi Ram Verma Aged About 60 Years Technical Officer, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, R/o 54/464/k, Infront Of Dilip Yadu Complex, Gayatri Nagar, Danganiya Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Through Registrar, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, G. E. Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ______________________________________________________________ For Petitioner:

Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1:

Shri Neeraj Pradhan, Panel Lawyer.

For Respondent No.2:

Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate.

Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J Order On Board 25.11.2021 1.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of respondent No.2 in not considering the claim of the petitioner so far as third time pay scale is concerned on completion of his 30 years of service as the representation made in this regard on 27.03.2019 (Annexure P-9) has not been decided till date.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that even before the petitioner had retired, the respondents had issued the circular/resolution dated 08.08.2018 (Annexure P-6) and 30.07.2019 (Annexure P-8), whereby they had ordered for grant of third time pay scale on completion of requisite length of service. The petitioner has got the requisite length of service and as per the

circular/resolution of the respondents was issued while the petitioner was in service, yet the respondent No.2 has not calculated the said benefits to the petitioner and has not extended the same till now. 3.

Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to take appropriate decision on the petitioner's representation made on 27.03.2019 (Annexure P-9) so far as claim of the petitioner for third time pay scale is concerned.

4.

Let respondent No.2 take a decision on due scrutiny of the entitlement part of the petitioner in terms of the circular/resolution governing the field within an outer limit of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5.

With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Nikita