Peman Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1906 of 2017

1. Peman Lal Sahu S/o Heeruram Sahu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Naharpur Urla, Durg, Police Station Pulgaon Tehsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Prabhari Mohan Nagar District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Non-applicant For Applicant - Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State - Shri Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board 17-04-2017 1.

Heard the matter finally.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant held arrested in connection with Crime No.92/2017 on 22-02-2017 by P.S. Mohan Nagar, District Durg, C.G. for the offence under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, 2015. After investigation police had filed the charge sheet which is pending before the Court of CJM Durg as Criminal Case No.1704/2017. The applicant is first offender. This is the first bail application and as per the allegation, 7.920 bulk liter liquor has been seized from the conscious possession of the applicant. He may be granted one opportunity. 3.

Per contra, learned counsel for the non-applicant/State opposed the argument advanced on behalf of the applicant though fairly conceded that there is no earlier criminal antecedent reported against the present applicant. 4.

Perused the entire material.

5.

On due consideration, I am inclined to grant one opportunity to the applicant so that he may remain in society without committing any offence in future. Consequently, the instant MCRC is hereby allowed. The applicant is

-2directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one solvent surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Durg, C.G. for his appearance before the said trial Court as and when directed.

6.

It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Bench by the Court below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicant suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this Court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally; (ii) the applicant does not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicant is found to be involved in any offence of the like nature; and (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicant remains absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law under intimation. 7.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE Aadil