← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5739/2019disposed off

Tailesh Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5739 of 2019 Tailesh Singh Rajput S/o Late Hanumant Singh Rajput Aged About 29 Years Rural Health Organizer (Male) Sub Health Centre, Amlidih, Development Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Permanent Resident Of House No. 32, Ward No. 2, Darri, Post Khujji, Tahsil Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 491661., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. S.K. Guha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/08/2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Sub Health Centre, Amlidih Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon to Sub Health Centre, Kaneli, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon. 2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

-24.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved