← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5993/2019disposed off

Mahendra Kumar Jaiswal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5993 of 2019 Mahendra Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Ramnihora Jaiswal Aged About 55 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) At Government Multipurpose Higher Secondary School Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralya, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Joint Director Public Instruction Directorate Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/08/2019 1.

The counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime makes a limited prayer that the petitioner's representation, which he has made to the respondents for counting his past services rendered as a Part Time Teacher for determining the length of service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits, be considered and decided by the respondents at the earliest.

2.

Without entering into the merits of the case and without expressing any opinion so far as the entitlement of the petitioner for the claim so made, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondents No.

-22 & 3 are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner at the earliest in accordance with the Rules and Regulations governing the field so far as the counting of past services rendered by the petitioner as Part Time Teacher is concerned, that too if any.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved