Smt. Shila Dhritlahare v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S. NO. 5262 OF 2018 Smt. Shila Dhritlahare, W/o Shri Deendayal Dhritlahare, aged about 45 years, working as Supervisor and posted at Mahila and Bal Vikas, Sonakhan, Police Station Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1.
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Mahila and Bal Vikas, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2.
Deputy Director, Department of Mahila and Bal Vikas, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.
Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (CG) 4.
District Program Officer, Mahila and Bal Vikas Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (CG) 5.
Project Officer, Mahila and Bal Vikas, Kasdol, District BalodabazarBhatapara (CG) 6.
Project Officer, Mahila and Bal Vikas, Palari, District BalodabazarBhatapara (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. U.R. Koshaley, Advocate.
For Respondents :
Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/08/2018 1.
The limited prayer which the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents for an early conclusion of the departmental enquiry.
2.
The petitioner in the instant case is posted as Supervisor in the Women and Child Development Department. The petitioner has been subjected to disciplinary proceeding and the same is pending consideration for quite some time. The only request the petitioner makes is, for a direction to the respondents for an early conclusion of the department enquiry. 3.
Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection in disposing of the writ petition acceding the prayer of the petitioner. 4.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to issue appropriate direction to the Enquiry Officer
ensuring that the departmental enquiry is concluded at the earliest preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5.
Learned counsel for the State shall issue necessary instructions to respondent no.2 for issuance of appropriate directions. 6.
The writ petition stands allowed and disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ Judge