Lalji Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3971 of 2021 • Lalji Yadav S/o Late Dashai, Caste Ahir, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Ulia, P.S. Pasta, Tehsil- Rajpur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sub- Division Rajpur, Tehsil Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tehsildar Tehsil- Rajpur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh

5. Halka Patwari Halka No. 6, Village Basen, Tehsil- Rajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

6. Gopal Prasad Gupta S/o Late Jagdev Sao Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Basen, Tehsil- Surajpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Shri Ravi Bhagat, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 28.09.2021 Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had purchased part and parcel of land bearing khasra No. 153/1 admeasuring 0.242 hectare at village Basen by sale deed dated 25.02.2013 and he was placed in possession of the said land. He further submits that the land is demarcated with the boundary marks in the sale deed. He further submits that

Respondent No. 6 subsequently purchased part and parcel of land bearing khasra No. 153/3 admeasuring 0.096 hectare on 31.08.2021 and is trying to disturb the possession of the petitioner on the basis of wrong map. Therefore, at this stage, the petitioner has filed an application for correction of the map of the respondent No. 6 which is pending before Respondent No. 2 and 4 and he prays that the Tahsildar may be directed to draw a correct map with respondent No. 3 so that the multiplicity of the proceeding may be avoided.

2. Perused the documents.

3. Without going into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction that the application for correction of map which has been filed may be decided by the Tahsildar after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and Respondent No. 6 within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is further directed that the Collector shall also supervise the issue as certain allegations are attributed against the Tahsildar. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Jyoti Judge