High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4759/2020disposed off

Nanku Singh Dhurwe v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4759 of 2020

1. Nanku Singh Dhurwe, S/o Kenwat Singh Dhurwe, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Singhari Tahsil Bodla District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Balak Ashram Larbakki Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Lata Talware, W/o Bahadur Talware Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Barbaspur Tahsil Bodla District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Aadavasi Kanya Ashram Bokkarkhar Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

3. Mangal Singh Dhurve, S/o Dhan Singh Dhurve Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Dhawaipani Tahsil Bodla District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Sambhupipar, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

4. Bholaram Banwasi, S/o Babulal Banvasi Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Ranidehra, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09.12.2020

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Rahuls