← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6000/2019disposed off

Ganesh Ram Sori v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6000 of 2019 Ganesh Ram Sori S/o Shri Jain Ram Sori Aged About 32 Years Working Rural Health Coordinator, Presently Posted At Sub Health Centre Jhurandi, Block Medical Office C.H.C. Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Patha, Police Station Chhuikhadan District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Medical Officer Community Health Centre, Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Anukul Biswal, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/08/2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Sub Health Centre Jhurandi, Block Medical Office C.H.C. Chhuikhadan District Rajnandgaon to Sub Health Centre Markeli, Block Medical Office C.H.C. Manpur, District Rajnandgaon.

2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred

-2and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved