← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4852/2020disposed off

Lalit Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4852 of 2020

1. Lalit Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Ghanshyam Sahu Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kathauli, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Ahilya Sahu W/o Shri Lalit Kumar Sahu Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kathauli, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

3. Vyas Narayan Sarwakar S/o Shri Ansh Kumar Sarwakar Aged About 48 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Loharpara, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

4. Dushyant Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Bodhiram Sahu Aged About 32 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Loharpara, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State : Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04.01.2021

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha