Nityanand Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5822 of 2019

1. Nityanand Yadav S/o Jalandhar Yadav Aged About 29 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Nagriya Nikay) Posted At Govt. Primary School Bhathudand, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

2. Gulshan Paikra S/o Govind Prasad Paikra Aged About 28 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Nagriya Nikay) Posted At Govt. Girls Primary School Pathalgaon, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

3. Shyam Sundar S/o Gula Ram Aged About 30 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Nagriya Nikay) Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School Pathalgaon, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

4. Shakuntala Bhoy D/o Suklal Bhoy Aged About 26 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Nagriya Nikay) Posted At Govt. Girls Primary School Pathalgaon, Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Pathalgaon, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06.08.2019

1. Heard.

2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition to direct the respondent No.2 to consider their case for grant of promotion in accordance with the provision of Chhattisgarh Teacher (Panchayat) Cadre (Bharti Tatha Seva Ke Sharte) Niyam, 2012.

3. The petitioners herein are working in different Schools under Nagriya Nikay in Block Pathalgaon, District Jashpur. The petitioners have claimed for promotion from the post of Assistant Teacher to Teacher (Nagriya Nikay) and they have also made representation (Annexure P/3) in this regard on 14.03.2019, however, no decision yet has been taken on the said representation. Therefore, the petitioners pray that the respondent

-2authorities may be directed to decide the representation which the petitioners have made, at the earliest.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction that the respondent No.2 shall decide the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2019 (Annexure P/3) expeditiously preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law and procedure.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder