Purushottam Singh Bhalavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4764 of 2020 Purushottam Singh Bhalavi S/o Late Shri P.L. Bhalavi Aged About 39 Years Pesha- Vanpal, Nivasi- Ward No.18, New Gondwana Colony Achholi Dongargarh, Tahsil And Thana Dongargarh, Jila- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, Vanvibhag, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Pradhan Mukhya Van Sanrakshak Karyalay Pradhan Mukhya Van Sanrakshak Chhattisgarh, Arany Bhavan Sector 19, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Mukhya Van Sanrakshak Durg Vritta, Durg Jila Durg, Chhattisgarh.

4. Vanmandladhikari Vanmandal- Khairagarh, Jila- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

5. Upvanmandladhikari Dongargarh, Jila- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

6. Parikshetra Adhikari Parikshetra Karyalay Dongargarh, Jila- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

7. Parikshetra Adhikari Parikshetra Karyalay Uttar Bortalav JilaRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

8. Denish Kumar Meshram S/o Shri A. Meshram Aged About 45 Years Pesha- Vanpal Nivasi- Parikshetra Uttar Bortalab Vanmandal Khairagarh, Jila- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09.12.2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/2 dated 26.10.2020 whereby the place of posting of the petitioner has been shifted from Dongargarh to Bortalab.

2. According to the petitioner, at the present place of posting the petitioner has come just about two months back vide order dated 26.08.2020 whereby the petitioner was shifted from Badhiyatola, Dongargarh to Dongargarh.

3. The contention of the petitioner is that apart from the fact that the present order amounts to frequent transfer, the petitioner's wife is also employed

-2under the respondents State and is posted at Dongargarh and therefore under the policy of the State Govt. the respondents ought to have considered posting the petitioner as far as possible at the same place.

4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner make an appropriate suitable representation for ventilating his grievances to the respondents No.2&3, who, in turn, shall consider the same in accordance with rules, guidelines and the policy governing the field at the earliest.

5. Meanwhile, let status quo as it exists today be maintained till the representation of the petitioner is decided.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder