Yashwant Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2109 of 2017 Yashwant Sahu S/o Narayan Singh Sahu, Aged About 33 Years R/o Near Hanuman Temple, Puraina, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRC No. 2422 of 2017 Pawan Bhawnani S/o Narayan Das Bhawnani, Aged About 31 Years R/o Bajaj Colony, C-13, Sector 1, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ------Respondent And MCRC No. 2409 of 2017 Radheshyam Sinha @ Pooran S/o Shri Bishram Sinha, Aged About 26 Years R/o Near Pani Tanki, Amlidih, Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondent For applicants - Shri C.R. Sahu and Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocates. For Respondent/State - Shri Vivek Sharma, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 13/06/2017 1.

All these bail applications are heard and decided together as they are arising out of the same crime number.

2.

The applicants have preferred these applications for grant of bail as they are arrested in connection with Crime No. 54/2017 registered in Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) for offence punishable under sections 419, 420 of Indian Penal Code and Section 24 of Chhattisgarh Ayurvigyan Parishad Adhiniyam. 3.

It is case of the prosecution that the applicants who are diploma holders were practicing with the permission of the Medical Council of India. Further they were not authorised to practice in the medicine, however they were running clinic.

4.

Learned counsels for the applicants submit that the applicants are in jail since 2/03/2017, charge sheet has been filed, maximum punishment prescribed is for 2 years and no further investigation is required, therefore the applicants may be released on bail.

5.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also for the fact that charge sheet has been filed, this court is inclined to release the applicants on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that the applicants shall be released on each of them furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for their regular appearance before it as and when directed.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Vacation Judge gouri