Ritesh Pandey @ Bhawani Shankar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(227) No. 519 of 2021 1.

Ritesh Pandey @ Bhawani Shankar , S/o. Sanat Kumar Pandey, aged about 35 years, 2.

Durgesh Pandey @ Rudra Shankar Pandey, S/o. Sanat Kumar Pandey, aged about 38 years, Both are R/o Village Nevra, Up Tahsil - Ganiyari, Tahsil - Sakri, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). 2.

Smt. Sarita Sahu, W/o. Shri Girdhari Sahu, aged about 27 years, 3.

Shri Bihari Singh Todar, S/o. Late Shri Mangal Singh Todar, aged about 40 years 4.

Shri Ramchandra Yadav, S/o. Shri Anuplal, aged about 28 years, No.2 to 4 all are R/o Gram - Nevra, Tahsil - Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For State-Respondent : Mr. Sameer Uraon, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board /09/2021 1.

This present petition has been brought only for the reason that the application under Order 39 Rule 3 of C.P.C. filed by the petitioners, before the Court of 8th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur has not been heard so far, because the presiding officer of the Court is on leave.

2.

Considered on the submissions. As there is usually a standing order present in every District Court, regarding hearing of cases on urgent basis, in absence of any Judicial Officer by another Judicial Officer present on duty. Therefore, the petitioner has the liberty to approach the District Judge in such a case and seek such direction for urgent hearing of the case accordingly.

3.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed off.

Certified copy today.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Balram