Suresh Kumar Navrang v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7823 of 2021 1.

Suresh Kumar Navrang S/o Bhagwat, aged about 27 years, 2.

Minesh Kumar Navrang, aged about 18 years, Both are resident of Village Bhimpuri Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ----Applicants

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh through: Station House Officer, Police Station, Takhatpur, civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) For Applicants :

Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr. D.C. Verma, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 25/10/2021 1.

The applicants have preferred this first Bail Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Istagasa No. 4/2021 registered at Police Station- Takhatpur, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 03/09/2021 at about 12:35 am, when Sub Inspector A.K. Yadav was on patrolling duty, he got an information to the extent that some persons are roaming on a stolen motor cycle and searching for customers to sale the said motor cycle. After the investigation, the police has registered the case against the unknown persons. During investigation, the police has arrested the

applicants on 03/09/2021.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. The police has not seized any articles from the possession of the applicants. The applicants have not committed any theft. He further submits that the prosecution has not collected sufficient material regarding theft of the said articles. The applicants are aged about 27 and 18 years, respectively, therefore, prayer is made to release the applicants on bail. 4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the cases, particularly the fact that the offence is triable by the JMFC and conclusion of trial may take some time, I am of the view that it is fit case to enlarge the applicants on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.

It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety each of the like sum amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before the trial Court as and when directed. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Rahul