Ramesh Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2322 of 2017

1. Ramesh Dhruv S/o Jethuram Dhruv, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bithaldah, Police Station Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

---- Non-applicant For Applicant - Shri P.P.Sahu, Advocate.

For Non-applicant/State - Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board 27-04-2017 1.

Heard the matter finally.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.106/2017 on 27-3-2017 by P.S. Lormi, Civil District Bilaspur, C.G. for the offence under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915. Charge sheet has not yet been filed and the applicant is remanded by the CJM Mungeli, C.G. The applicant is first offender. There is no earlier criminal antecedent of the present applicant. This is the first bail application. As per the allegation, 9 bulk liter country liquor has been seized from the the applicant along with one motorcycle No. CG 28 7869. He will not commit any offence in future. He may be granted an opportunity to remain in bail during trial.

3.

Per contra, learned counsel for the non-applicant/State opposed the argument advanced on behalf of the applicant, though fairly conceded that the applicant is not involved in any of the earlier offence. 4.

Perused the entire material.

5.

On due consideration, looking to the fact that the applicant is in jail since 1 month, first offender and is having no earlier criminal antecedent and looking

-2to the quantity of liquor so sized from the applicant, I am inclined to grant one opportunity to the applicant so that he shall not commit any offence in future and remain peacefully in society. Consequently, the instant MCRC is hereby allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one solvent surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Mungeli, C.G. for his appearance before the said trial Court as and when directed. 6.

It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Bench by the Court below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicant suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this Court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally; (ii) the applicant does not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicant is found to be involved in any offence of the like nature; and (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicant remains absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law under intimation. 7.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE Aadil