← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1306/2015disposed off

Dhannu Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-07-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1306 of 2015 • Dhannu Ram Sahu S/o Late Shri Asharam Aged About 40 Years Occupation Chowkidar to Maniyari Water Resourse Division Mungeli, R/o Village Goindri, P.S. Mungeli, District Mungeli CG ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through Secretary Department Of Water Recourse, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. Rakhi, New Raipur CG

2. The Chief Executive Engineer, Water Resource Regional Bilaspur, District Bilaspur CG

3. The Executive Engineer Manyari Water Recourse Division Mungeli, District Mungeli, CG

4. The Chief Engineer Hasdev Kachar Water Resourse Department - Bilaspur, District Bilaspur CG

5. The Chief Engineer, Manyari Water Resourse Division Mungeli, District Mungeli, CG ---- Respondents For petitioner Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Advocate.

For Respondent/State Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 2-71. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition praying for direction to the respondent-authorities to pass orders for continuance of his services and to revoke the order of termination Annexure P-1 dated 11-3-2015.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Chaukidar in the Water Resources Division, Mungeli on 14-6-2011. On 29-12-2012 he has been regularized. Thereafter on 11-3-2015 he was terminated.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be

disposed of with a direction to be given to the respondent No. 2 that he may dispose of his represention which was received on 26-6-2018 by the respondent No. 3 in the light of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Avtar Singh -v- Union of India and others reported in [(2018 1 SCC 268)].

4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondent No. 3 shall decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in the light of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Avtar Singh (supra) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in accordance with law and procedure.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Pathak