Gyaneshwari Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

<< ^ m THE HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, AT - B1LASPUR WRIT PETITION FC1 N0.

o PETITIONER ^\ AfiED - 38 YEARS, ^^•< ^v^"'""

Y^-OS^ 1 WIFE OF SHRI MADHUSUDAN SINGH ./ ^^y^ R/0 VILLAGE - LOTLOTA, P. O. - GOPALPUR, P. S. & TEHSIL - KATGHORA, DISTRICT-KORBA[C.G.]

VERSUS

1.

STATE OF CHHATTiSGARH THROUGH - ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHEDULE TRIBE & SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT, MANTRALAYA MAHANADi BHAWAN, NAYA RAIPUR 2.

THE SCHEDUtE TR!BE STATE LEVEL CASTi i^ c^ni .^S S'Jif.'"& iTTEE, CHHATTSSGARH, hl. Q. - PANDIT RAViSHNAKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSiTYCAMPUS, RAIPUR [CHHATTISGARH] LLECTOR, y DISTRICT-KORBA[C.G.] 4.

THE SUPEriSNTENDEOT OF POLi DISTR!CT-KORBA[C.G.] 5.

THE SUB DiVISiONAL OFFICER [REVENUE] SUB DiVISiON, KATGHORA, DiSTRiCT- KORBA[C.G.] ^r^^ F~'

^) 6.

SHRI KESHAR P^ASAD BHARIYA, AGED - 35 YEARS, SON OF SHRI KANHAIYA LAL BHARIYA, PRESENTLYSARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYAT, NAVAGAONKALA, BLOCK-KATGHORA, R/OVILLA6E-LOTLOTA, P. S. & TEHSIL - KATGHORA, DISTRICT-KORBA[C.G.] 7.

KAMTA PRASADBHARIYA, AGED-37YEARS, S/0 SHRI KANHAIYA LAL BHARIYA, R/OVILLAGE-LOTLOTA, P.S.&TEHSIL-KATGHORA, DISTRICT-KORBA[C.G.] Writ PetEtion under Article ~ 226 of the Constitution of india.

i!^

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(ClNo.104of2015 Gyaneshwari Singh PETITIONER

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri R.K. Kesharwani, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. SINGLE BENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

ORAL ORDER (22/01/2015) Petitioner has preferred this writ petition to restrain the respondents No. 6 & 7 from taking benefit admissible to a Scheduled Tribe person becausethe said respolidents d6 not belong toScheduled Tribe community. 2.

Nparit can be issued against an individual. The petitioner, if he so desiFes.Emay approach the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee seeking cancellation of the caste Gertificate issued to the said respondents. If any such application is filed by the petitioner, the Committee shall consider the same and decide it on merits.as early as possible. 3.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge v^ r