High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5878/2019disposed off

Shailendra Kumar Banjare v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5878 of 2019 Shailendra Kumar Banjare S/o Shri Mukut Ram Banjare Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Gadapali ( G ) R/o Village - Durug, Tahsil Bilaigarh District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi, Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Bilaigarh District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Akshara Amit, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07/08/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School, Gadapali, Block Bilaigarh to Government Primary School, Pandrapali, Block- Bilaigarh.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a

representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit