Smt. Ishwari Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4810 of 2020

1. Smt. Ishwari Bai W/o Shri Arjun Kumar Ratre, Aged About 32 Years Occupation, 4th Class/ Rashoiya Karmi Shash. Post Matric Aadiwashi Kanya Chatrawas Jarhabhata Bilaspur, R/o Village Sakri, Thana Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Arjun Kumar Ratre, S/o Shri Krishn Prasad Ratre, Aged About 33 Years Occupation, 4th Class/ Rashoiya Karmi Shash. Prayas Aawasiya Vidhyalay Koni, R/o Village Sakri, Thana Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantraly Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikash Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Sahayak Aayukt, Aadiwashi Vikash Bilasur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For State : Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16.12.2020

1. The Petitioners through the present Writ Petition seek for a direction to the Respondents to take decision on the claim of the Petitioners for placing their services as contingency paid employees.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that present Petitioners are working with the Respondents since 2007. The Petitioners meanwhile had moved an application before the Respondents for considering their claim for placing them as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the Petitioners rendered with the Respondents.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners have already made detailed representation before the authorities concerned which are pending consideration and have till now not been decided by the Respondents Authorities. Therefore, a limited direction may be issued to Respondent No.3 to take appropriate decision on the claim of the Petitioners to consider their matter for being placed as contingency paid employee.

4. Learned State Counsel has no objection if the Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 for considering the representation of the Petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider the representation made by the Petitioners and take decision on the claim of the Petitioners in accordance with the rules governing the field.

6. It is expected that Respondent No.3 shall take a decision on the claim of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha