← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5944/2019disposed off

Teman Lal Nirmalkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5944 of 2019 Teman Lal Nirmalkar Son Of Dayalu Ram Nirmalkar Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Matrakhujji, Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhariya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh Sahu, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07/08/2019 1.

The grievance of the petitioners in the instant writ petition is that they were initially appointed in the Panchayat Department and had put in about more than 8 years of service, their services have been absorbed with the Education Department.

2.

According to the counsel for the petitioners, they have already put in more than 10 years of service and as such they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati/Higher Pay-Scale which the respondents have till date not considered.

-23.

Given the limited prayer which has been raised by the petitioners, let the petitioners make a fresh representation in addition to the representation if any they have made to the respondents No.1 & 3 who in turn shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the field.

4.

Let this exercise be completed within a period of 90 days from the date the petitioners make a fresh representation.

5.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved