Phool Kumari Nirala v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WRIT PETITION (C| N0. \^S OF 2015 PETITIQNER:

Phool Kumari Nirala, W/o Ram Das Nirala, aged about years, R/o village Barbhantha, Gram Panchayat Barbhantha (A), PS & Tahsil Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh.

Civil & Revenue Dist. Raigarh (CG).

Versus

^''^•^ p^-^s^-;^ ^sdW3'

•ifSs9. -• 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

RESPONDENTS :

2.

Chhattisgarh State Elecdon Commission, Chhattisgarh, Near Mahadevghat, Raipur (CG).

3.

Collector-cum-District Election Officer, Raigarh, Dist.

Raigarh (CG).

4.

Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh (CO).

5.

Tahsildar-cum-Retuming Officer, Sarangarh, Dist.

Raigarh (CG).

6.

Manjupati Tularam Nirala, R/o village Barbhantha, Gram Panchayat Barbhantha (A), PS & Tahsil Sarangarh, Dist.

Raigarh (CG).

7.

Lalita, W/o Rajendra Kurrey, R/o village Barbhantha, Gram Panchayat Barbhantha (A), PS & Tahsil Sarangarh, Dist.

Raigarh(CG).

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE coNSTrrunoN OF INI?IA

II 'S- ;-\fS iituS '^.^ 3^ @) •;^ f'w ri: SE 18E •^M fS;;?

jK"

t'ff:

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.rciNo. 138 of2015 PETITIONER Phool Kumari Nirala tB

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh & others »TShri V.K. Agrgwal, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Siddharth Rathore, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Smt. Anubhuti Marhas,counsel for State Election Commission. RESPONDENTS iSSi '^s:

-»i SSilNGLE BENCH '.'s.!^~~- ~ HON'Bt.ESHRI PRASHANT KUIUARIVIISHRA. J.

ORALORDER (27/01/2015) {?1| 4; PiStjtioner is seeking a direction to the respondents-authorities to g^ept his nomination fbrm fbrthe officeof Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat BaJbhantha, District Raigarh.

^||i Writ petition is substantially against improper rejection of nomination fotn. Such relief cannot be allowed in a writ petition in view of bar contained ^ i';:i.: '^:''/;';iU2' -. '-..

...

. _'

/ l^&ing an election petition UhcleBSection •122 ofthe Chhattisgarh Panchayat ^ .

..

^.

ijji$§lerArticle 243-0 of the.epnstitution ofilndia. Petitioner's remedy lies in HK IgiAdhiniyam, 1993.

..

• 3.2| Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. I:iiiiss:

/,'- Judge \^ !iw ^•' ^l'11;