Sandeep Kumar Jangde v. Smt. Asha Jangde
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRR No.918 of 2018 Sandeep Kumar Jangde, S/o Shri Kapoorchand, aged about 28 years, Caste - Suryawanshi, R/o Village - Dabadih, Post - Kosir, Police Station & Tahsil - Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District - Janjgir-Champa, C.G., Presently working as Constable No. 44 at Police Station Takhatpur, Civil and Revenue District - Bilaspur, C.G. ---- Applicant
Versus
1. Smt. Asha Jangde, W/o Shri Sandeep Kumar Jangde, aged about 27 years,
2. Ku. Queen Jangde, D/o Shri Sandeep Kumar Jangde, aged about - 3 years, Respondent No. 2 is Minor through her Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Asha Jangde, Caste - Suryawanshi, Both are R/o Village - Mahaka, P.S. Shivrinarayan, Civil and Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, C.G. ---- Respondents For Applicant :
Shri Parasmani Shriwas, Adv.
For Respondents :
None Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order On Board 23/08/2018
1. Heard on admission. Perused the impugned order.
2. This revision has been preferred by the husband/Applicant against the order dated 18.07.2018, whereby the learned Family Court, Janjgir has granted interim maintenance of Rs. 4000/- in favour of the wife/Respondent No.1. and Rs. 2500/- in favour of the daughter/Respondent No.2.
3. There is no dispute that respondent No.1 is legally wedded wife of the applicant and from their wedlock respondent No. 2 has born and at present they are residing separately.
4. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the Respondent/Wife is residing separately from the applicant without any reasonable cause. He further submits that the monthly salary of the applicant is only Rs. 24,000/- per month, therefore, looking to his income, the interim maintenance granted by the Family Court is on higher side.
5. The respondents are legally wedded wife and child of the applicant. They are residing separately from him with or without any reasonable cause is a matter of evidence. Since the respondents are unable to maintain themselves, the Family Court has rightly granted interim maintenance in their favour.
6. Looking to the financial status of the applicant, in my considered opinion, grant of interim maintenance of Rs. 6500/- in favour of the respondent/wife and her daughter is just and proper. I find no merit in the instant revision. It is, therefore, dismissed at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge yasmin