← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3110/2020disposed off

M.D. Ishtiyak Ahamd v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-04Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3110 of 2020 • M.D. Ishtiyak Ahamd S/o Lt. Mohammad Kasim, R/o D/24, Raja Talab, Nurani Chowk, Raipur, Tehsil And District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) - 492001 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Raipur Development Authority Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Development Authority, Bhakta Mata Karma Commercial Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. President Raipur Development Authority, Bhakta Mata Karma Commercial Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Revenue Officer (Tehsildar) Raipur Vikas Pradhikaran, Bhakta Mata Karma Commercial Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents _____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Mr. Vikram Sharma, Dy. Government Advocate.

For Respondents/RDA :

Mr. Ashish Shrivastava and Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocates ______________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per, P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 04.01.2021 1.

The Petitioner has moved this Court with the following prayers : "10.1.

That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quashing the tender/auction notices of Bombay Market issued by Raipur Development Authority. 10.2.

That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions issued by Raipur Development Authority may kindly be set-aside and the respondents may kindly be directed not to dispossess the petitioner and resumed possession of the shop by extra judicially by use of force.

10.3.

That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relating to the matter.

10.4.

Any other relief/relief's which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be allowed."

2.

When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Shri Ashish Shrivastava, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents-Raipur Development Authority, submits that the auction scheduled with regard to the room which was in occupation of the Petitioner has already been put to auction and auction was conducted on 17.08.2020. In view of the turn of events, the matter has virtually become infructuous, submits the learned counsel. 3.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (P.R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Chandra