Arun Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W. A. No. 243 OF 2016

1. Arun Sharma S/o Shri B.M. Sharma, Aged About 57 Years Assistant Grade 3, Divisional Forest Office, Balod 491226, Range Office Gurur, Tah And Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh.

2. Sanat Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Shri Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 51 Years Assistant Grade 3, Divisional Forest Office, Balod 491226, Range Office Balod, Tah And Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Tah And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Tah And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Forest Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, 492001.

4. Divisional Forest Officer, Balod Forest Division, Balod, 491226, Tah And Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Appellants :

Shri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri. U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate ____________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board 08/10/2018 Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 1.

Heard counsel for the parties.

2.

A categorical statement has been made in paragraph-10 of the affidavit of the State i.e. submissions made on behalf of respondent/State of Chhattisgarh, in view of order dated 06/12/2017 passed by Hon'ble Court, the same reads as under :-

"10. That, since the appellants Arun Kumar Sharma and Sanat Kumar Sharma have rendered more than 10 years of services without any break, therefore, in adherence to the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Court in W.A. No. 209/2015 and in consonance with the order dated 09/05/2017 (Annexure F), the said two employees are found entitled for receiving pension with effect from the date of their superannuation, in the aforesaid circumstances." 3.

In support of the said statement, an official order passed by the respondent has been annexed as Annexure - F and is dated 09/05/2017. 4.

In view of the same, this appeal stands disposed off. The appellants have been granted the benefit of pension, for which they have been fighting. Let the benefit of the decision as per Annexure - F accrue to the respondents. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Yogesh